Logo
Cybersecurity

Cybersecurity Has an Experience Problem. Who Trains the Next Generation?

Employers need professionals who can do the job. Newcomers need opportunities to prove they can. A stronger cybersecurity workforce depends on connecting those two needs.

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Okt 15, 2026
Cybersecurity Has an Experience Problem. Who Trains the Next Generation?

A familiar contradiction sits at the entrance to many technical careers: employers want experience, but gaining experience requires someone to offer the first opportunity. Cybersecurity faces this challenge while organizations continue to seek people who can protect systems, investigate incidents and manage risk.

The UK's latest government research illustrates the tension. Published on 29 September 2026, Cyber Security Skills in the UK Labour Market 2026 reported a 14% increase in cybersecurity graduates between the 2022/23 and 2023/24 academic years, bringing the total to 7,950. Yet enrolment in cybersecurity-specific apprenticeships fell by 15% between the 2023/24 and 2024/25 academic years. The report also estimated that the UK's cybersecurity workforce grew by only 2% over the preceding year. GOV.UK

More graduates are entering the potential talent pool, but education alone doesn't guarantee that they can step into operational roles. Employers need evidence of practical ability, while newcomers need environments where they can develop it.

The gap between learning and being job-ready

Cybersecurity covers a wide range of responsibilities. A security operations analyst may investigate suspicious activity, while a penetration tester evaluates weaknesses in an authorized environment. A governance specialist assesses controls and risk. Each role requires a different combination of knowledge, judgment and practice.

The UK report's analysis of job advertisements offers another clue. Among core cybersecurity postings that specified minimum experience requirements, 34% asked for two to three years of experience, while 16% asked for zero to one year. These figures apply only to postings with a stated minimum requirement, but they illustrate why some newcomers may struggle to find their first role. GOV.UK

A certificate can show that someone has studied a subject. It cannot, by itself, demonstrate how that person investigates an alert, documents evidence or communicates a technical finding to a manager.

The answer isn't to abandon formal education. It's to connect education with practical work before a candidate's first full-time cybersecurity role.

Make the first step more structured

Organizations and training providers can help close the gap through three measures:

  • Use realistic exercises. Let learners investigate simulated incidents, review logs, assess vulnerabilities and document their findings in controlled environments.
  • Define role-specific expectations. An aspiring SOC analyst needs different practical evidence from someone preparing for penetration testing or security governance.
  • Create supervised entry points. Internships, apprenticeships, junior analyst rotations and mentored projects give newcomers a way to demonstrate their skills while learning professional practices.

The US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) provides a useful reference through its NICE Workforce Framework for Cybersecurity. Its framework describes cybersecurity work through tasks, knowledge and skills, helping organizations connect job responsibilities with the capabilities people need to perform them. NIST's guidance on proficiency also emphasizes demonstrated workplace capability rather than relying solely on academic knowledge or time spent in the field. NIST

This gives employers a more practical way to assess candidates. Instead of asking only which courses someone has completed, they can examine what the person can actually do and identify what still requires supervision.

Build the pathway before the vacancy

For Indonesia's cybersecurity workforce, the opportunity is to make the transition from education to employment more deliberate. Training providers can align learning with recognizable job functions. Employers can identify suitable supervised assignments and define what entry-level competence looks like. Learners can build portfolios that demonstrate their work, reasoning and documentation.

ITSEC Cyber & AI Academy can contribute to this process through structured cybersecurity and AI learning connected to professional capability development. The objective is to help learners build relevant knowledge and practical skills that can support their next career step.

A healthy talent pipeline needs experienced professionals, but it also needs a reliable way to develop the people who will become experienced tomorrow.

Looking to build your cybersecurity or AI skills? Explore learning opportunities at ITSEC Cyber & AI Academy.

References

  1. UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. Cyber security skills in the UK labour market 2026. Published 29 September 2026. Read the official report
  2. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Identifying Proficiency: NICE Framework Work Roles & Levels of Responsibility. Created 23 January 2026; updated 13 March 2026. Read the NIST guidance
  3. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Workforce Framework for Cybersecurity (NICE Framework). Published 16 November 2020. Read the framework publication
Share this post

You may also like

Indonesia’s Cybersecurity Talent Problem Is Becoming a Skills Problem
Cybersecurity

Indonesia’s Cybersecurity Talent Problem Is Becoming a Skills Problem

cybersecurity indonesia
cyber security indonesia
cybersecurity di indonesia
cyber security di indonesia
cybersecurity in indonesia
cyber security in indonesia

Indonesia needs more cybersecurity professionals. That part is obvious. What is becoming less obvious is whether the real problem is still about numbers. The 2026 SANS | GIAC Cybersecurity Workforce Research Report found that 60% of surveyed organizations said their teams lacked the right skills to defend against current threats. More concerning, 27% reported breaches directly linked to capability gaps. That changes the conversation. A company can have a security team, a dashboard full of alerts and a stack of expensive tools. The harder question is whether the people behind them know what to do when something unusual happens. CYBERSECURITY WORK IS MOVING FAST Artificial intelligence is making that question harder. AI can already help with alert analysis, vulnerability prioritization and repetitive investigation tasks. Attackers can use the same technology to make attacks faster and easier to scale. In August 2026, Vice Minister of Communication and Digital Affairs Nezar Patria warned that agentic AI could allow cyberattacks to operate with less direct human involvement. He also highlighted threats such as harvest

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Sep 01, 2026 — 3 minutes read
Security Teams Need to Understand How Software Actually Gets Shipped
Cybersecurity

Security Teams Need to Understand How Software Actually Gets Shipped

A security professional reviews an application and finds a vulnerability. The development team fixes it. Everyone moves on. Then the same type of problem appears in the next release. That’s usually a clue that the weakness lives somewhere deeper than one piece of code. Perhaps the build process accepts an unsafe dependency. A security check happens too late. A container configuration is copied from an old template. Developers receive feedback after the release is practically finished. NIST’s National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence is putting more attention on exactly this part of software security. Its updated DevSecOps resources, published on 24 September, include CI/CD pipeline automation, containerized application deployment and functional scenarios showing security activities throughout the software development lifecycle. NIST [https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2026/09/new-nist-nccoe-resources-devsecops-and-october-28-webinar-agentic-ai?utm_source=chatgpt.com] The workforce implication is straightforward. Application security professionals increasingly need to understand how software moves from a developer’s machine into production. SECURITY WORK IS MOVING INTO THE PIPELINE Traditional security testing can happen near the end of development. DevSecOps pushes security activities into the processes developers already use to build, test and deploy

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Okt 05, 2026 — 3 minutes read
How AI Helps Reduce False Positives in Security Assessments
Cybersecurity

How AI Helps Reduce False Positives in Security Assessments

Modern security teams are drowning in alerts. Vulnerability scanners, SIEM platforms, threat detection tools and security assessments generate thousands of findings every day. While visibility is essential, not every finding represents a genuine threat. Many turn out to be false positives. As organizations expand their attack surfaces and adopt increasingly complex environments, managing false positives has become one of the biggest operational challenges in cybersecurity. Because ultimately, cybersecurity is not about generating more alerts. It is about identifying the risks that truly matter. WHAT ARE FALSE POSITIVES IN CYBERSECURITY? A false positive occurs when a security tool or assessment identifies something as a vulnerability or threat, even though it poses little or no actual risk. In other words, a finding appears dangerous but cannot realistically be exploited or does not have meaningful impact. False positives can originate from: * Vulnerability scanners. * Automated security assessments. * Threat detection systems. * SIEM platforms. * Security monitoring tools. * Misconfigured rules and signatures. Although these tools are designed to maximize detection, excessive false positives

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Jun 15, 2026 — 5 minutes read

Receive weekly
updates on new posts

Subscribe