Logo
Cybersecurity

Cybersecurity Talent Needs to Understand How Things Get Built

The security team can’t inspect every finished product at the door. More cyber professionals need to understand what happens on the assembly line.

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Sep 09, 2026
Cybersecurity Talent Needs to Understand How Things Get Built

For years, cybersecurity careers have often been imagined around defense: monitor systems, detect suspicious activity, investigate incidents and fix vulnerabilities.

That work remains essential. But security is increasingly moving upstream.

ENISA’s current revision of the European Cybersecurity Skills Framework is explicitly aligning cybersecurity roles with the secure digital product lifecycle, emerging technologies such as AI and new regulatory requirements. The framework itself maps cybersecurity into 12 professional profiles with defined responsibilities, knowledge and competencies.

NIST has made an equally telling change. Version 2.2.0 of the NICE Framework Components added Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management as a work role and DevSecOps as a competency area.

Those aren’t cosmetic additions. They reflect where cybersecurity work is going.

Security Is Becoming Part of the Build Process

Modern digital services rarely come from one neat stack of code written entirely inside one organization. They may depend on cloud infrastructure, open-source packages, APIs, external services, automated development pipelines and software supplied by third parties.

Every dependency creates another place where security decisions can be made well or badly.

That means cyber professionals increasingly benefit from understanding questions such as:

  • Where do software dependencies come from and how are they verified?
  • How are secrets and credentials handled during development?
  • Can security testing become part of the development pipeline?
  • What happens when a third-party component develops a vulnerability?
  • Who owns the risk when several suppliers contribute to one digital service?

These questions sit somewhere between traditional security, software engineering, cloud operations and risk management. Job descriptions, as usual, have failed to respect departmental boundaries.

DevSecOps Changes What “Cyber Skills” Look Like

A SOC analyst and a DevSecOps practitioner may both work in cybersecurity, but their daily environments can look very different.

DevSecOps requires security thinking inside software delivery. A practitioner may need to understand development workflows, CI/CD pipelines, cloud configurations, automated testing and how developers actually work.

Supply chain security adds another dimension. NIST describes its new NICE work role around identifying, assessing and mitigating cybersecurity risks throughout supply chains.

For workforce development, this means cybersecurity training can’t stay isolated from the systems and processes learners will eventually protect.

Someone studying application security should see how software is assembled. Someone learning cloud security should work with configurations and deployment processes. Someone preparing for supply chain risk should understand how dependencies move through an organization.

Build It, Break It, Fix It

Practical training becomes especially useful here because the skills are procedural.

Give learners an application pipeline with an insecure dependency. Let them identify the problem, modify the process and test whether their control actually works. Introduce a cloud configuration mistake midway through deployment and see whether it gets caught before production.

The exercise becomes less about remembering security advice and more about applying it while something is being built.

That connection between technical knowledge and operational practice is central to ITSEC Cyber & AI Academy, where hands-on environments can help learners develop capabilities closer to the systems, workflows and security decisions they’ll encounter professionally.

Cybersecurity will always need people watching what comes through the door. Increasingly, it also needs people standing much closer to the factory floor.

Explore practical cybersecurity and AI training at ITSEC Cyber & AI Academy.

References: ENISA: European Cybersecurity Skills Framework, updated 7 September 2026 · ENISA: European Cybersecurity Skills Conference 2026 · NIST NICE Framework Components v2.2.0

Share this post

You may also like

One Compromised System Rarely Stays One Compromised System
Cybersecurity

One Compromised System Rarely Stays One Compromised System

A business application stops working. The server itself is fine. The network looks normal. Authentication is available. Then someone discovers that an external service used by the application is unavailable. Suddenly the incident diagram gets bigger. ENISA’s Threat Landscape 2026, published on 22 September and discussed in a dedicated webinar on 29 September, puts this problem near the centre of its analysis. ENISA says the growing interconnectedness of digital ecosystems is increasing exposure to cyber risk and continues to observe attacks targeting dependencies, including supply chain and third party relationships. ENISA [https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/enisa-threat-landscape-2026?utm_source=chatgpt.com] For workforce development, there’s a practical lesson here: cybersecurity professionals need to understand dependencies as well as assets. AN ASSET LIST DOESN’T SHOW THE WHOLE RISK Knowing what systems an organization owns is useful. Knowing what those systems rely on is different. A customer portal might depend on an identity provider, DNS, cloud infrastructure, payment service, API, software library and managed service. Several other applications may rely on exactly the same components. Compromise one shared dependency and the blast radius changes quickly. Security

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Sep 30, 2026 — 3 minutes read
Your Cybersecurity Skills Gap Might Be a Job Design Problem
Cybersecurity

Your Cybersecurity Skills Gap Might Be a Job Design Problem

Cybersecurity job descriptions can become ambitious documents. An organization needs someone who understands cloud security, investigates incidents, tests applications, manages risk, explains regulations, tunes security tools and perhaps briefs senior management when something goes wrong. Five years of experience preferred. The candidate sounds excellent. Finding this person may take a while. ENISA’s European Cybersecurity Skills Framework offers a useful reminder that cybersecurity isn’t one profession wearing several different badges. The framework separates the field into 12 professional profiles, including Cyber Incident Responder, Cybersecurity Architect, Penetration Tester, Cybersecurity Risk Manager, Digital Forensics Investigator and Cyber Threat Intelligence Specialist. Each profile has different tasks, knowledge and competencies. They also depend on one another. That changes how organizations should think about a “skills shortage.” CHECK THE JOB BEFORE BLAMING THE TALENT POOL Some roles will naturally overlap, particularly in smaller teams. ENISA’s own user manual treats the framework as flexible and shows how organizations can combine responsibilities according to their circumstances. The problem starts when overlap becomes accumulation. A useful workforce review can ask: * Which tasks genuinely

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Sep 22, 2026 — 3 minutes read
A Breach Doesn't End When Services Come Back Online
Cybersecurity

A Breach Doesn't End When Services Come Back Online

On 7 November 2026, Chainalysis announced that its Reactor platform, KYT transaction-monitoring interface and API, and Address Screening products were back online after a security incident. The company said the services had been restored with enhanced security measures and asked customers to reconnect through a specific process. [1] Chainalysis first disclosed the incident on 30 October. It said an external actor had used what it described as “offensive agentic techniques” to access its systems and internal tools without authorisation. Its initial notice reported access to user IDs, names, email addresses and organisational role labels, but said there was no evidence at that stage that investigation content, authentication credentials or session tokens had been accessed. [1] The assessment changed as the investigation progressed. In an update on 4 November, Chainalysis said names, usernames, password hashes and “live tokens” for all users had been exposed. It separately confirmed that an on-path attack exposed passwords belonging to a subset of customers. The company said that attack path had been contained and remediated. It

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Nov 09, 2026 — 3 minutes read

Receive weekly
updates on new posts

Subscribe