Logo
Cybersecurity

The Payment Looks Complete. But Did Your Money Actually Go Through?

As digital payments become part of everyday life, a few seconds of verification can prevent a costly mistake.

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Nov 13, 2026
The Payment Looks Complete. But Did Your Money Actually Go Through?

Imagine this: a customer scans a QRIS code, shows you a payment confirmation and waits for their purchase. The screen says “Payment Successful.” Everything looks right. You hand over the goods.

A few minutes later, you check your account. No money has arrived.

This is a growing concern as digital payments become part of everyday business in Indonesia. A transaction may look complete on someone's phone, but that doesn't necessarily mean the money has reached its destination.

According to data from the Indonesian Fintech Association (AFTECH), presented during the opening of Bulan Fintech Nasional (BFN) 2026, Indonesia had 70.59 million QRIS users and more than 49.39 million merchants as of September 2026. Around 96.7% of those merchants were micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs). [1]

These numbers show how deeply digital payments have entered everyday commerce. They also mean more transactions depend on users and merchants recognising when something isn't right.

A Screenshot Is Not Proof of Payment

On 11 November 2026, Bank Indonesia issued a reminder about fake QRIS payment receipts, warning merchants against relying solely on screenshots or payment confirmations displayed on customers' phones.

The reason is simple: digital payment receipts can be manipulated. Bank Indonesia explained that fraudulent receipts can be edited or even generated using artificial intelligence, including by changing the merchant name and transaction amount. [2]

Fraudsters can also reuse old receipts or claim that payment notifications are delayed. In a busy shop, where merchants handle several customers at once, a quick glance at a phone screen can be enough to miss the difference.

Consumers face similar risks. Fraudulent payment links, fake notifications and messages impersonating banks or e-wallet providers can direct users to websites designed to steal personal information or account credentials.

The scale of financial fraud in Indonesia makes this more than an isolated concern.

According to OJK's October 2026 report, the Indonesia Anti-Scam Centre (IASC) had blocked 702,833 accounts associated with suspected fraud and secured Rp825.2 billion in funds as of 30 September 2026. It had also facilitated the return of Rp207.16 billion to victims. [3]

The figures show why transaction security requires attention from both financial institutions and the people using their services.

Five Things to Check Before Completing a Digital Payment

Safer transactions don't require complicated procedures. They start with a few simple habits.

1. Verify the recipient before paying.

When scanning a QRIS code, check the merchant name displayed in your payment application. Make sure it matches the business you're paying.

2. Check the amount twice.

Confirm the transaction amount before entering your PIN or approving the payment. Be cautious if the displayed amount differs from the agreed price.

3. Don't rely on screenshots.

For merchants, wait for confirmation through your own payment application, merchant dashboard or official notification system. A screenshot provided by a customer isn't independent evidence that funds have arrived.

4. Be careful with payment links and urgent requests.

Fraudsters often use messages claiming that a payment has failed, an account needs verification or a transaction must be completed immediately. Avoid clicking unfamiliar links. Open your bank or e-wallet application directly instead.

5. Stop when something doesn't match.

If the recipient, amount or transaction status looks suspicious, don't proceed. Verify the details through the official channel of your bank or payment provider.

These checks take seconds. Recovering money from a fraudulent transaction can take considerably longer.

Security Is Part of the Fintech Experience

Bulan Fintech Nasional 2026 runs from 11 November to 12 December under the theme Fintech All Around You. It reflects how financial technology is becoming part of everyday activities, from shopping and paying bills to running a business.

But greater adoption also creates more opportunities for cybercriminals to exploit human behaviour, weak verification processes and vulnerable digital systems.

For fintech providers and businesses, consumer awareness needs to go hand in hand with technical security. Applications, websites and supporting infrastructure require regular security assessments to identify weaknesses before attackers find them.

For individual users, mobile protection can help reduce exposure to phishing websites and harmful links. ITSEC Asia's IntelliBroń Aman provides mobile security protection against phishing and other harmful online threats.

For organisations developing or operating digital financial services, application and infrastructure security also need regular testing.

This is where Bronyx AI comes in. Developed by ITSEC Asia, Bronyx AI is an AI-assisted autonomous penetration testing platform designed to help organisations identify exploitable vulnerabilities across their digital environments.

Find out how Bronyx AI can help your organisation assess its security exposure before attackers take advantage of it.

Explore Bronyx AI

Digital payments should make everyday transactions easier. A simple habit of checking before confirming helps ensure that convenience doesn't come at the expense of security.

Before your next digital payment, take a moment to verify. The confirmation on the screen is only one part of the transaction.

References

[1] AFTECH / Finansial Fokus, 12 November 2026. QRIS adoption and fintech development in Indonesia.
https://www.finansialfokus.com/detail/1425273/aftech-7059-juta-pengguna-qris-buka-jalan-fintech-ke-sektor-riil

[2] Bank Indonesia, 11 November 2026. Cara Memastikan Pembayaran QRIS Benar-Benar Masuk.
https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/ruang-media/cerita-bi/Pages/cara-memastikan-pembayaran-qris-benar-benar-masuk.aspx

[3] OJK, 27 October 2026. Satgas PASTI and IASC financial fraud enforcement update.
https://ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/info-terkini/Pages/Satgas-PASTI-Tindak-Aktivitas-Keuangan-Ilegal%2C-Penipuan-Transaksi-Keuangan%2C-dan-Pergadaian-Ilegal.aspx

Share this post

You may also like

Protecting Critical Infrastructure Requires a Different Kind of Cybersecurity Training
Cybersecurity

Protecting Critical Infrastructure Requires a Different Kind of Cybersecurity Training

A suspicious connection appears in a corporate network. The security team investigates, isolates the affected system and starts remediation. In a conventional IT environment, that may be a reasonable first response. Now imagine the affected system controls part of an electricity substation, a water treatment facility or an industrial production line. Isolating it without understanding the operational consequences could disrupt a process that needs to remain stable and safe. This is one of the defining challenges of operational technology (OT) security. NIST's Guide to Operational Technology Security explains that OT systems interact with the physical environment and operate under specific performance, reliability and safety requirements. Security decisions must account for those requirements alongside confidentiality and integrity. [https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=https://www.nist.gov&sz=32] NIST +1 For cybersecurity workforce development, that changes the training equation. KNOWING THE NETWORK ISN'T ENOUGH OT environments include industrial control systems, supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA), building automation and other systems that monitor or control physical processes. Their operating requirements can differ considerably from those of ordinary business IT. [https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=https://www.nist.gov&sz=32] NIST A security practitioner working in this environment needs

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Okt 13, 2026 — 4 minutes read
Cybersecurity Talent Needs to Understand How Things Get Built
Cybersecurity

Cybersecurity Talent Needs to Understand How Things Get Built

For years, cybersecurity careers have often been imagined around defense: monitor systems, detect suspicious activity, investigate incidents and fix vulnerabilities. That work remains essential. But security is increasingly moving upstream. ENISA’s current revision of the European Cybersecurity Skills Framework is explicitly aligning cybersecurity roles with the secure digital product lifecycle, emerging technologies such as AI and new regulatory requirements. The framework itself maps cybersecurity into 12 professional profiles with defined responsibilities, knowledge and competencies. NIST has made an equally telling change. Version 2.2.0 of the NICE Framework Components added Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management as a work role and DevSecOps as a competency area. Those aren’t cosmetic additions. They reflect where cybersecurity work is going. SECURITY IS BECOMING PART OF THE BUILD PROCESS Modern digital services rarely come from one neat stack of code written entirely inside one organization. They may depend on cloud infrastructure, open-source packages, APIs, external services, automated development pipelines and software supplied by third parties. Every dependency creates another place where security decisions can be made well or badly. That means

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Sep 09, 2026 — 3 minutes read
What Makes AI-Powered Penetration Testing Different From Automated Scanners?
Cybersecurity

What Makes AI-Powered Penetration Testing Different From Automated Scanners?

INTRODUCTION How much of what a vulnerability scanner flags every week actually turns out to be real? Research from OWASP puts the false positive rate for common vulnerability types somewhere between 15% and 30%, and separate research from Snyk found that security teams now spend roughly 70% of their time chasing alerts that end up being nothing at all. That gap between what a tool reports and what is actually exploitable is not a minor inconvenience. It is the reason a third of companies surveyed admitted they responded late to a genuine attack because their team was buried in phantom threats instead. ITSEC Asia, Indonesia's leading cybersecurity company, works with organizations across the region that have learned this the hard way, and the question that keeps coming up is simple. If a scanner already checks the boxes, why does AI-powered penetration testing exist at all, and what does it actually do differently? Source: OWASP false positive research via DEV Community [https://dev.to/kuboidsecurelayer/why-automated-vulnerability-scanners-miss-most-real-security-vulnerabilities-2p96] · Snyk: Minimizing False Positives [https://snyk.io/blog/minimizing-false-positives-enhancing-security-efficiency/] THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE: FOLLOWING RULES

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Jul 03, 2026 — 5 minutes read

Receive weekly
updates on new posts

Subscribe