Logo
Cybersecurity

This is Why You Should Automate Your Cybersecurity

"According to Bill Gates, "The first rule of any technology used in business is that automation applied to an efficiently managed operation will increase efficiency." While cybersecurity operations may not have been on his mind at the time, his thinking is truly applicable to today's cybersecurity operations centers (CSOCs).

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Jul 20, 2023
This is Why You Should Automate Your Cybersecurity

DO YOU NEED TO AUTOMATE YOUR CYBERSECURITY OPERATIONS?

The answer is likely "yes," and whenever I ask anyone about automation, they unequivocally state that automation will undoubtedly enhance the overall cybersecurity foundation if implemented correctly in their organizations. They say "if" because the organizations I speak with, not many of them have actually implemented automation into their operations, even if they intend to do so. They usually reason that they are too busy to stop and learn how.

Here are some of the strongest reasons to automate...

We live in a world where launching cyber attacks on an organization is far cheaper than defending it. To make matters worse, the threat landscape is becoming increasingly difficult to cover. You face exponentially growing threats where adversaries are getting the upper hand every day while your security tools incessantly warn you.

Business resilience is the ultimate goal of any cybersecurity operation, and the only way to improve the overall resilience of your organization is to improve your overall efficiency in protecting it. The modern CSOC's role is, among other things, to translate resilience into strength across every function of the cybersecurity operational model and become more efficient in protecting, detecting, responding, and recovering from attacks. But it is easier said than done, especially when you are overwhelmed and lacking the internal automation knowledge to implement automation effectively.

THE EASIEST TASK TO ACHIEVE

Let us assume that both yourself and others know that there are some things that should be automated but have not yet been done. If that is the case, then that is the easiest task to achieve or resolve for yourself, and that is where you will see immediate success and quick ROI when you automate any of those processes.

Correlated Threat Data - Oh, the data! On a good day, you can handle it, but on a bad day, it controls you and never lets go. First, you need to collect threat data from various security tool silos, correlate it with global threat intelligence, and perform threat analysis on your data. If you try to do all of this manually, you will spend a lot of time and resources from your CSOC. Automating the correlation of data is a good place to start for quick success and invest all that spare time into value-added work.

Reacting and Responding to Threats - When you finally detect an intruder or threat, your entire team needs to react and respond faster than the threat can spread through your network, endpoints, devices, and servers. Mitigation is about working with different security products in your environment, at the same time creating protection across that environment, and trying to stay one step ahead of the attacker. Most of these workflows can be automated, thus speeding up your detection and intervention time when threats occur.

Breach Reporting and Notification - Efficiency will become important as new regulations demand greater transparency and emphasize shorter timeframes for breach notification, thus requiring faster understanding of various events. On average, it takes organizations 200 days to identify and report a breach. Automation is key to reducing analysis, reporting, and notification time to ensure compliance with regulations.

Start by defining your automation needs and identifying the easiest tasks to accomplish in your CSOC, and the best place to start is by automating security investigation elements, incident response, and remediation tasks. Automating data correlation and analysis using the outputs from multiple tools will save your team a lot of time when responding to alerts. Some CSOC teams take an intelligent approach to automation, incrementally adding automation in the areas that are most easily understood. The experiences and learning processes that the team goes through during this automation journey are a continuous stepping stone to further automation areas.

The threat landscape will forever grow in complexity, efficiency, and volume. If you do not automate at least some operations in your CSOC, the threats will get the better of you at some point. Automating cybersecurity operations is now, more than ever, a necessity rather than a luxury, and increasing it will dramatically enhance your efficiency

Share this post

You may also like

Protecting Critical Infrastructure Requires a Different Kind of Cybersecurity Training
Cybersecurity

Protecting Critical Infrastructure Requires a Different Kind of Cybersecurity Training

A suspicious connection appears in a corporate network. The security team investigates, isolates the affected system and starts remediation. In a conventional IT environment, that may be a reasonable first response. Now imagine the affected system controls part of an electricity substation, a water treatment facility or an industrial production line. Isolating it without understanding the operational consequences could disrupt a process that needs to remain stable and safe. This is one of the defining challenges of operational technology (OT) security. NIST's Guide to Operational Technology Security explains that OT systems interact with the physical environment and operate under specific performance, reliability and safety requirements. Security decisions must account for those requirements alongside confidentiality and integrity. [https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=https://www.nist.gov&sz=32] NIST +1 For cybersecurity workforce development, that changes the training equation. KNOWING THE NETWORK ISN'T ENOUGH OT environments include industrial control systems, supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA), building automation and other systems that monitor or control physical processes. Their operating requirements can differ considerably from those of ordinary business IT. [https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=https://www.nist.gov&sz=32] NIST A security practitioner working in this environment needs

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Okt 13, 2026 — 4 minutes read
Good Cybersecurity Training Should Let People Get Things Wrong
Cybersecurity

Good Cybersecurity Training Should Let People Get Things Wrong

A SOC analyst receives several alerts and investigates the wrong one first. A penetration tester misses a vulnerability. Someone investigating an incident makes an assumption that sends the team in the wrong direction. In a real environment, those mistakes can become expensive. Inside a controlled training environment, they’re valuable evidence. NIST’s NICE webinar on 16 September focuses on preparing students for cyber careers through reality based education and hands on experience. Its agenda explicitly raises an interesting principle: failure can be valuable workforce data. The session examines how educators and employers can introduce controlled realism into cybersecurity learning so participants develop work based capabilities rather than simply completing exercises. That distinction deserves more attention. A CORRECT ANSWER DOESN’T EXPLAIN HOW SOMEONE GOT THERE Traditional assessments are good at answering a narrow question: did the participant know the answer? Operational cybersecurity needs more information. Suppose two analysts eventually identify the same compromised account. One notices an unusual authentication pattern immediately. The other spends 40 minutes investigating unrelated activity before arriving at the same conclusion. Both

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Sep 16, 2026 — 3 minutes read
Security Teams Need to Understand How Software Actually Gets Shipped
Cybersecurity

Security Teams Need to Understand How Software Actually Gets Shipped

A security professional reviews an application and finds a vulnerability. The development team fixes it. Everyone moves on. Then the same type of problem appears in the next release. That’s usually a clue that the weakness lives somewhere deeper than one piece of code. Perhaps the build process accepts an unsafe dependency. A security check happens too late. A container configuration is copied from an old template. Developers receive feedback after the release is practically finished. NIST’s National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence is putting more attention on exactly this part of software security. Its updated DevSecOps resources, published on 24 September, include CI/CD pipeline automation, containerized application deployment and functional scenarios showing security activities throughout the software development lifecycle. NIST [https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2026/09/new-nist-nccoe-resources-devsecops-and-october-28-webinar-agentic-ai?utm_source=chatgpt.com] The workforce implication is straightforward. Application security professionals increasingly need to understand how software moves from a developer’s machine into production. SECURITY WORK IS MOVING INTO THE PIPELINE Traditional security testing can happen near the end of development. DevSecOps pushes security activities into the processes developers already use to build, test and deploy

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Okt 05, 2026 — 3 minutes read

Receive weekly
updates on new posts

Subscribe