Logo
Cybersecurity

This is Why You Should Automate Your Cybersecurity

"According to Bill Gates, "The first rule of any technology used in business is that automation applied to an efficiently managed operation will increase efficiency." While cybersecurity operations may not have been on his mind at the time, his thinking is truly applicable to today's cybersecurity operations centers (CSOCs).

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Jul 20, 2023
This is Why You Should Automate Your Cybersecurity

DO YOU NEED TO AUTOMATE YOUR CYBERSECURITY OPERATIONS?

The answer is likely "yes," and whenever I ask anyone about automation, they unequivocally state that automation will undoubtedly enhance the overall cybersecurity foundation if implemented correctly in their organizations. They say "if" because the organizations I speak with, not many of them have actually implemented automation into their operations, even if they intend to do so. They usually reason that they are too busy to stop and learn how.

Here are some of the strongest reasons to automate...

We live in a world where launching cyber attacks on an organization is far cheaper than defending it. To make matters worse, the threat landscape is becoming increasingly difficult to cover. You face exponentially growing threats where adversaries are getting the upper hand every day while your security tools incessantly warn you.

Business resilience is the ultimate goal of any cybersecurity operation, and the only way to improve the overall resilience of your organization is to improve your overall efficiency in protecting it. The modern CSOC's role is, among other things, to translate resilience into strength across every function of the cybersecurity operational model and become more efficient in protecting, detecting, responding, and recovering from attacks. But it is easier said than done, especially when you are overwhelmed and lacking the internal automation knowledge to implement automation effectively.

THE EASIEST TASK TO ACHIEVE

Let us assume that both yourself and others know that there are some things that should be automated but have not yet been done. If that is the case, then that is the easiest task to achieve or resolve for yourself, and that is where you will see immediate success and quick ROI when you automate any of those processes.

Correlated Threat Data - Oh, the data! On a good day, you can handle it, but on a bad day, it controls you and never lets go. First, you need to collect threat data from various security tool silos, correlate it with global threat intelligence, and perform threat analysis on your data. If you try to do all of this manually, you will spend a lot of time and resources from your CSOC. Automating the correlation of data is a good place to start for quick success and invest all that spare time into value-added work.

Reacting and Responding to Threats - When you finally detect an intruder or threat, your entire team needs to react and respond faster than the threat can spread through your network, endpoints, devices, and servers. Mitigation is about working with different security products in your environment, at the same time creating protection across that environment, and trying to stay one step ahead of the attacker. Most of these workflows can be automated, thus speeding up your detection and intervention time when threats occur.

Breach Reporting and Notification - Efficiency will become important as new regulations demand greater transparency and emphasize shorter timeframes for breach notification, thus requiring faster understanding of various events. On average, it takes organizations 200 days to identify and report a breach. Automation is key to reducing analysis, reporting, and notification time to ensure compliance with regulations.

Start by defining your automation needs and identifying the easiest tasks to accomplish in your CSOC, and the best place to start is by automating security investigation elements, incident response, and remediation tasks. Automating data correlation and analysis using the outputs from multiple tools will save your team a lot of time when responding to alerts. Some CSOC teams take an intelligent approach to automation, incrementally adding automation in the areas that are most easily understood. The experiences and learning processes that the team goes through during this automation journey are a continuous stepping stone to further automation areas.

The threat landscape will forever grow in complexity, efficiency, and volume. If you do not automate at least some operations in your CSOC, the threats will get the better of you at some point. Automating cybersecurity operations is now, more than ever, a necessity rather than a luxury, and increasing it will dramatically enhance your efficiency

Share this post

You may also like

Your Incident Response Team Has an AI Problem to Rehearse
Cybersecurity

Your Incident Response Team Has an AI Problem to Rehearse

An AI assistant connected to internal data starts returning information it shouldn’t reveal. What does the incident responder collect first? Traditional evidence still matters, but the investigation may also require prompts, model outputs, retrieval sources, system instructions, access permissions and records of actions taken through connected tools. Disabling an endpoint won’t necessarily answer what the model accessed or what information it produced. Recent workforce data suggests many teams haven’t rehearsed that situation. ISACA’s 2026 State of Cybersecurity research, based on more than 1,800 cybersecurity professionals globally, found that only 8% of organizations regularly conduct AI specific response exercises. The same research found that 45% see LLM SecOps as a skills gap, up 12 percentage points from 2025 and 21 points from 2024. ISACA [https://www.isaca.org/about-us/newsroom/press-releases/2026/only-8-percent-of-organizations-global-enterprises-conduct-regular-ai-specific-response-exercises?utm_source=chatgpt.com] AI security is becoming operational work rather quickly. AI CHANGES THE EVIDENCE NIST convened an AI Incident Management Workshop in May because a new class of incidents is emerging as AI systems become embedded in critical infrastructure, cybersecurity and other operational environments. Its work covers incident definitions, lifecycles, taxonomies, existing playbooks

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Okt 07, 2026 — 3 minutes read
The Next Identity Skills Gap Is Hiding Behind the Login Screen
Cybersecurity

The Next Identity Skills Gap Is Hiding Behind the Login Screen

Most people understand authentication as a familiar sequence. Enter credentials, prove who you are and access the application. Modern systems keep working long after that login screen disappears. Applications use identity and access tokens to determine what users and workloads are allowed to do. Tokens support capabilities such as single sign-on, federation and API access. NIST describes them as a central part of access management infrastructure and zero trust architectures. On 15 September, NIST finalized IR 8587 with CISA involvement, providing implementation guidance for protecting tokens and assertions from forgery, theft and misuse. The publication covers identity providers, authorization servers, cryptographic key protection, token verification and lifecycle controls. For cybersecurity teams, there’s a workforce implication hiding inside that architecture. IDENTITY SECURITY HAS BECOME AN ENGINEERING SKILL IAM can sound administrative: create accounts, assign permissions, remove access when someone leaves. Those responsibilities remain. Cloud applications, APIs and machine identities have added another technical layer. Security professionals increasingly need to understand: * How tokens are issued, validated, renewed and revoked * How SSO and federation

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Sep 23, 2026 — 3 minutes read
Cybersecurity Has a People Skills Gap Too
Cybersecurity

Cybersecurity Has a People Skills Gap Too

An analyst has spent two hours investigating suspicious activity. They understand the sequence, know which systems may be affected and have a reasonable hypothesis about what the attacker did. Then the incident manager asks a simple question: “What do we need to do now?” The answer suddenly requires more than technical knowledge. Cybersecurity work is full of moments like this. Findings need to be explained. Assumptions need to be challenged. Teams need to disagree without losing time. Technical specialists have to communicate with executives, engineers, auditors and people who would prefer never to hear the phrase “lateral movement” before their first coffee. NIST’s NICE program treats these capabilities as part of cybersecurity work itself. Its workplace skills resources include communication, collaboration, critical thinking, conflict management, resilience, strategic thinking and relationship building. That matters for how organizations train cybersecurity professionals. COMMUNICATION CHANGES THE VALUE OF TECHNICAL SKILL Consider a penetration tester who discovers a serious vulnerability. Finding it requires technical skill. Explaining why it matters requires another set of abilities. The tester needs to describe

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Sep 25, 2026 — 3 minutes read

Receive weekly
updates on new posts

Subscribe