Logo
Cybersecurity

Security Teams Need to Understand How Software Actually Gets Shipped

Finding vulnerabilities still matters. Preventing weak code, dependencies and configurations from reaching production requires a different set of skills.

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Okt 05, 2026
Security Teams Need to Understand How Software Actually Gets Shipped

A security professional reviews an application and finds a vulnerability. The development team fixes it. Everyone moves on.

Then the same type of problem appears in the next release.

That’s usually a clue that the weakness lives somewhere deeper than one piece of code. Perhaps the build process accepts an unsafe dependency. A security check happens too late. A container configuration is copied from an old template. Developers receive feedback after the release is practically finished.

NIST’s National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence is putting more attention on exactly this part of software security. Its updated DevSecOps resources, published on 24 September, include CI/CD pipeline automation, containerized application deployment and functional scenarios showing security activities throughout the software development lifecycle. NIST

The workforce implication is straightforward. Application security professionals increasingly need to understand how software moves from a developer’s machine into production.

Security Work Is Moving Into the Pipeline

Traditional security testing can happen near the end of development. DevSecOps pushes security activities into the processes developers already use to build, test and deploy software.

That requires people who can work across disciplines.

Useful DevSecOps capability includes understanding:

  • How source code moves through a CI/CD pipeline
  • Where automated security testing should occur
  • How dependencies and software components are tracked
  • How containers and deployment configurations are built
  • Which findings should block a release and which require review
  • How credentials and secrets are handled during builds
  • How security feedback reaches developers quickly enough to be useful

NIST’s DevSecOps project maps practices from its Secure Software Development Framework into a reference model intended to show how security tasks can operate within modern development pipelines. NCCoE

NICE has also added DevSecOps as a formal competency area in version 2.2.0 of its cybersecurity workforce framework. NIST

That puts software delivery knowledge squarely inside cybersecurity skills development.

Automation Still Needs Judgment

A pipeline can run dozens of checks before software reaches production. That doesn’t mean every alert deserves to stop a release.

Someone still has to understand context.

A vulnerable component might be unreachable in the application. Another finding may expose an internet-facing function handling sensitive information. A failed configuration test could indicate a minor deviation or a serious exposure.

The security professional needs enough development knowledge to discuss the finding with engineers and enough risk judgment to decide what deserves immediate attention.

Otherwise, automation simply produces security findings at machine speed. The backlog will be delighted.

Train With the Pipeline Running

DevSecOps is difficult to learn from diagrams alone.

A stronger exercise gives participants source code, a CI/CD pipeline, automated tests, container builds and a deployment environment. Introduce an insecure dependency or configuration, then ask learners to identify where the control should catch it and what should happen next.

Let them change the pipeline, run another build and see the result.

That practical loop fits the learning approach at ITSEC Cyber & AI Academy. Cybersecurity professionals can build technical capability around application security, testing and secure delivery by working with systems that behave like the environments they’ll encounter on the job.

A vulnerability report tells a team what went wrong once.

DevSecOps skills help them change the process that allowed it through.

Explore hands-on cybersecurity and AI learning at ITSEC Cyber & AI Academy.

References

  1. NIST NCCoE, “New NIST NCCoE Resources on DevSecOps and October 28 Webinar on Agentic AI,” 24 September 2026
  2. NIST NCCoE, “Secure Software Development, Security, and Operations (DevSecOps) Practices Live Document,” 24 March 2026, updated on a rolling basis
  3. NIST NICE, “NICE Releases NICE Framework Components v2.2.0,” 28 April 2026
Share this post

You may also like

Cybersecurity Has a People Skills Gap Too
Cybersecurity

Cybersecurity Has a People Skills Gap Too

An analyst has spent two hours investigating suspicious activity. They understand the sequence, know which systems may be affected and have a reasonable hypothesis about what the attacker did. Then the incident manager asks a simple question: “What do we need to do now?” The answer suddenly requires more than technical knowledge. Cybersecurity work is full of moments like this. Findings need to be explained. Assumptions need to be challenged. Teams need to disagree without losing time. Technical specialists have to communicate with executives, engineers, auditors and people who would prefer never to hear the phrase “lateral movement” before their first coffee. NIST’s NICE program treats these capabilities as part of cybersecurity work itself. Its workplace skills resources include communication, collaboration, critical thinking, conflict management, resilience, strategic thinking and relationship building. That matters for how organizations train cybersecurity professionals. COMMUNICATION CHANGES THE VALUE OF TECHNICAL SKILL Consider a penetration tester who discovers a serious vulnerability. Finding it requires technical skill. Explaining why it matters requires another set of abilities. The tester needs to describe

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Sep 25, 2026 — 3 minutes read
AI Agents Change What Security Teams Need to Know
Cybersecurity

AI Agents Change What Security Teams Need to Know

NIST is building an AI agent workflow for one of cybersecurity’s most widely used public resources. On 17 September, its Information Technology Laboratory presented work on an agentic workflow designed to help enrich vulnerability information in the National Vulnerability Database. NIST says the project is intended to help the NVD cope with the increasing scale and complexity of disclosed vulnerabilities, and the webinar covered its architecture, implementation issues and early results. The project illustrates a broader change. AI is moving from producing information toward performing multi-step tasks. NIST describes AI agents as systems capable of autonomous actions that can interact with external systems and internal data. For cybersecurity professionals, that means another layer of skills is arriving. SECURITY HAS TO FOLLOW THE ACTION A conventional AI application might receive a prompt and return an answer. An agent may have access to tools, data and permissions that allow it to continue working. That changes the questions a security professional needs to ask. * What systems can the agent access? * Which actions can

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Sep 18, 2026 — 3 minutes read
Four Strong Reasons to Use an MSSP
Cybersecurity

Four Strong Reasons to Use an MSSP

Test

The multitude of challenges to be faced is the main reason why most organizations today are turning to managed security service providers (MSSPs) to help them address these issues. The challenges of strengthening human resources, processes, and technologies as efforts to secure their intellectual property and data appropriately, while still complying with cybersecurity regulations, can be a daunting task even for well-managed IT departments. With these considerations in mind, here are four main reasons why I prefer MSSPs over in-house security. USING MSSP SAVES YOU MONEY Building, running, and maintaining a cybersecurity ecosystem comes with significant costs. One of the reasons is that many software solutions require specialized hardware and equipment to run, and they often come with recurring licensing costs. Additionally, the salaries of cybersecurity employees and the training they need to effectively utilize new tools and technologies add to the expenses. One of the CFO's favorite aspects of using MSSP is that it can replace the capital expenditures often needed to add new tools with a large

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Jul 10, 2023 — 5 minutes read

Receive weekly
updates on new posts

Subscribe